BILL NUMBER: AB 501	CHAPTERED  09/15/99

	CHAPTER   382
	FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE   SEPTEMBER 15, 1999
	APPROVED BY GOVERNOR   SEPTEMBER 15, 1999
	PASSED THE ASSEMBLY   AUGUST 30, 1999
	PASSED THE SENATE   AUGUST 25, 1999
	AMENDED IN SENATE   AUGUST 19, 1999
	AMENDED IN SENATE   JULY 15, 1999
	AMENDED IN SENATE   JUNE 15, 1999
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY   APRIL 26, 1999

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Nakano
   (Coauthors:  Assembly Members Calderon and Havice)

                        FEBRUARY 18, 1999

   An act to amend Sections 1048.1 and 1050 of the Penal Code,
relating to career criminal prosecutions.


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 501, Nakano.  Criminal procedure:  career criminal
prosecutions.
   Existing law authorizes the court to grant a continuance of a
criminal trial only for good cause, and convenience of the parties
does not in itself constitute good cause.  Existing law also requires
the superior court, when scheduling a trial date at an arraignment
in cases of specified offenses, to make reasonable efforts to avoid
setting that trial on the same day that another trial is set
involving the same prosecuting attorney.
   In addition, under existing law, a prosecutor assigned a criminal
case that is prosecuted under the Career Criminal Prosecution Program
is required to make all reasonable efforts to reduce the time
between the arrest for and disposition of the charge, perform all
court appearances on that particular case, and is prohibited from
negotiating a plea agreement with the defendant except in limited
circumstances.
   This bill would require the superior court when scheduling a trial
date at an arraignment in a case prosecuted pursuant to the Career
Criminal Prosecution Program, to make reasonable efforts to avoid
setting the trial on the same day that another trial is set involving
the same prosecuting attorney.  This bill would also expand the
grounds for good cause for a continuance of a trial to include a case
prosecuted pursuant to the Career Criminal Prosecution Program where
the prosecuting attorney assigned to the case has a hearing in that
court or another court on a different case.  Under these conditions,
the bill would authorize the court to grant only one continuance per
case, not to exceed 10 days.
   This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 1050 of
the Penal Code proposed by SB 69, to be operative if SB 69 and this
bill are both enacted and become effective on or before January 1,
2000, and both bills are enacted and become effective on or before
January 1, 2000, and this bill is enacted last.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:


  SECTION 1.  Section 1048.1 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
   1048.1.  In scheduling a trial date at an arraignment in superior
court involving murder, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 187,
an alleged sexual assault offense, as described in subdivisions (a)
and (b) of Section 11165.1, or an alleged child abuse offense, as
described in Section 11165.6, or a case being handled in the Career
Criminal Prosecution Program pursuant to Sections 999b through 999h,
reasonable efforts shall be made to avoid setting that trial, when
that case is assigned to a particular prosecuting attorney, on the
same day that another case is set for trial involving the same
prosecuting attorney.
  SEC. 2.  Section 1050 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
   1050.  (a) The welfare of the people of the State of California
requires that all proceedings in criminal cases shall be set for
trial and heard and determined at the earliest possible time.  To
this end the Legislature finds that the criminal courts are becoming
increasingly congested with resulting adverse consequences to the
welfare of the people and the defendant.  Excessive continuances
contribute substantially to this congestion and cause substantial
hardship to victims and other witnesses.  Continuances also lead to
longer periods of presentence confinement for those defendants in
custody and the concomitant overcrowding and increased expenses of
local jails.  It is therefore recognized that the people, the
defendant, and the victims and other witnesses have the right to an
expeditious disposition, and to that end it shall be the duty of all
courts and judicial officers and of all counsel, both for the
prosecution and the defense, to expedite these proceedings to the
greatest degree that is consistent with the ends of justice.  In
accordance with this policy, criminal cases shall be given precedence
over, and set for trial and heard without regard to the pendency of,
any civil matters or proceedings.
   (b) To continue any hearing in a criminal proceeding, including
the trial, (1) a written notice shall be filed and served on all
parties to the proceeding at least two court days before the hearing
sought to be continued, together with affidavits or declarations
detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary and
(2) within two court days of learning that he or she has a conflict
in the scheduling of any court hearing, including a trial, an
attorney shall notify the calendar clerk of each court involved, in
writing, indicating which hearing was set first.  A party shall not
be deemed to have been served within the meaning of this section
until that party actually has received a copy of the documents to be
served, unless the party, after receiving actual notice of the
request for continuance, waives the right to have the documents
served in a timely manner.  Regardless of the proponent of the
motion, the prosecuting attorney shall notify the people's witnesses
and the defense attorney shall notify the defense's witnesses of the
notice of motion, the date of the hearing, and the witnesses' right
to be heard by the court.  The superior and municipal courts of a
county may adopt rules, which shall be consistent, regarding the
method of giving the notice or waiver of service required by this
subdivision, where a continuance is sought because of a conflict
between scheduled appearances in the courts of that county.
   (c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), a party may make a motion for
a continuance without complying with the requirements of that
subdivision.  However, unless the moving party shows good cause for
the failure to comply with those requirements, the court may impose
sanctions as provided in Section 1050.5.
   (d) When a party makes a motion for a continuance without
complying with the requirements of subdivision (b), the court shall
hold a hearing on whether there is good cause for the failure to
comply with those requirements.  At the conclusion of the hearing the
court shall make a finding whether good cause has been shown and, if
it finds that there is good cause, shall state on the record the
facts proved that justify its finding.  A statement of the finding
and a statement of facts proved shall be entered in the minutes.  If
the moving party is unable to show good cause for the failure to give
notice, the motion for continuance shall not be granted.
   (e) Continuances shall be granted only upon a showing of good
cause.  Neither the convenience of the parties nor a stipulation of
the parties is in and of itself good cause.
   (f) At the conclusion of the motion for continuance, the court
shall make a finding whether good cause has been shown and, if it
finds that there is good cause, shall state on the record the facts
proved that justify its finding.  A statement of facts proved shall
be entered in the minutes.
   (g) When deciding whether or not good cause for a continuance has
been shown, the court shall consider the general convenience and
prior commitments of all witnesses, including peace officers.  Both
the general convenience and prior commitments of each witness also
shall be considered in selecting a continuance date if the motion is
granted.  The facts as to inconvenience or prior commitments may be
offered by the witness or by a party to the case.
   For purposes of this section, "good cause" includes, but is not
limited to, those cases involving murder, as defined in subdivision
(a) of Section 187, allegations that a violation of one or more of
the sections specified in subdivision (a) of Section 11165.1 or
Section 11165.6, or domestic violence as defined in Section 13700, or
a case being handled in the Career Criminal Prosecution Program
pursuant to Sections 999b through 999h, has occurred and the
prosecuting attorney assigned to the case has another trial,
preliminary hearing, or motion to suppress in progress in that court
or another court.  A continuance under this subdivision shall be
limited to a maximum of 10 additional court days.  Only one
continuance per case may be granted to the people under this
subdivision for cases handled under the Career Criminal Prosecution
Program and that continuance shall be for the shortest time possible,
not to exceed 10 days.
   (h) Upon a showing that the attorney of record at the time of the
defendant's first appearance in the superior court on an indictment
or information is a Member of the Legislature of this state and that
the Legislature is in session or that a legislative interim committee
of which the attorney is a duly appointed member is meeting or is to
meet within the next seven days, the defendant shall be entitled to
a reasonable continuance not to exceed 30 days.
   (i) A continuance shall be granted only for that period of time
shown to be necessary by the evidence considered at the hearing on
the motion.  Whenever any continuance is granted, the court shall
state on the record the facts proved that justify the length of the
continuance, and those facts shall be entered in the minutes.
   (j) Whenever it shall appear that any court may be required,
because of the condition of its calendar, to dismiss an action
pursuant to Section 1382, the court must immediately notify the Chair
of the Judicial Council.
   (k) This section shall not apply when the preliminary examination
is set on a date less than 10 court days from the date of the
defendant's arraignment on the complaint, and the prosecution or the
defendant moves to continue the preliminary examination to a date not
more than 10 court days from the date of the defendant's arraignment
on the complaint.
  SEC. 3.  Section 1050 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
   1050.  (a) The welfare of the people of the State of California
requires that all proceedings in criminal cases shall be set for
trial and heard and determined at the earliest possible time.  To
this end the Legislature finds that the criminal courts are becoming
increasingly congested with resulting adverse consequences to the
welfare of the people and the defendant.  Excessive continuances
contribute substantially to this congestion and cause substantial
hardship to victims and other witnesses.  Continuances also lead to
longer periods of presentence confinement for those defendants in
custody and the concomitant overcrowding and increased expenses of
local jails.  It is therefore recognized that the people, the
defendant, and the victims and other witnesses have the right to an
expeditious disposition, and to that end it shall be the duty of all
courts and judicial officers and of all counsel, both for the
prosecution and the defense, to expedite these proceedings to the
greatest degree that is consistent with the ends of justice.  In
accordance with this policy, criminal cases shall be given precedence
over, and set for trial and heard without regard to the pendency of,
any civil matters or proceedings.
   (b) To continue any hearing in a criminal proceeding, including
the trial, (1) a written notice shall be filed and served on all
parties to the proceeding at least two court days before the hearing
sought to be continued, together with affidavits or declarations
detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary and
(2) within two court days of learning that he or she has a conflict
in the scheduling of any court hearing, including a trial, an
attorney shall notify the calendar clerk of each court involved, in
writing, indicating which hearing was set first.  A party shall not
be deemed to have been served within the meaning of this section
until that party actually has received a copy of the documents to be
served, unless the party, after receiving actual notice of the
request for continuance, waives the right to have the documents
served in a timely manner.  Regardless of the proponent of the
motion, the prosecuting attorney shall notify the people's witnesses
and the defense attorney shall notify the defense's witnesses of the
notice of motion, the date of the hearing, and the witnesses' right
to be heard by the court.  The superior and municipal courts of a
county may adopt rules, which shall be consistent, regarding the
method of giving the notice or waiver of service required by this
subdivision, where a continuance is sought because of a conflict
between scheduled appearances in the courts of that county.
   (c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), a party may make a motion for
a continuance without complying with the requirements of that
subdivision.  However, unless the moving party shows good cause for
the failure to comply with those requirements, the court may impose
sanctions as provided in Section 1050.5.
   (d) When a party makes a motion for a continuance without
complying with the requirements of subdivision (b), the court shall
hold a hearing on whether there is good cause for the failure to
comply with those requirements.  At the conclusion of the hearing the
court shall make a finding whether good cause has been shown and, if
it finds that there is good cause, shall state on the record the
facts proved that justify its finding.  A statement of the finding
and a statement of facts proved shall be entered in the minutes.  If
the moving party is unable to show good cause for the failure to give
notice, the motion for continuance shall not be granted.
   (e) Continuances shall be granted only upon a showing of good
cause.  Neither the convenience of the parties nor a stipulation of
the parties is in and of itself good cause.
   (f) At the conclusion of the motion for continuance, the court
shall make a finding whether good cause has been shown and, if it
finds that there is good cause, shall state on the record the facts
proved that justify its finding.  A statement of facts proved shall
be entered in the minutes.
   (g) (1) When deciding whether or not good cause for a continuance
has been shown, the court shall consider the general convenience and
prior commitments of all witnesses, including peace officers.  Both
the general convenience and prior commitments of each witness also
shall be considered in selecting a continuance date if the motion is
granted.  The facts as to inconvenience or prior commitments may be
offered by the witness or by a party to the case.
   (2) For purposes of this section, "good cause" includes, but is
not limited to, those cases involving murder, as defined in
subdivision (a) of Section 187, allegations that stalking, as defined
in Section 646.9, a violation of one or more of the sections
specified in subdivision (a) of Section 11165.1 or Section 11165.6,
or domestic violence as defined in Section 13700, or a case being
handled in the Career Criminal Prosecution Program pursuant to
Sections 999b through 999h, has occurred and the prosecuting attorney
assigned to the case has another trial, preliminary hearing, or
motion to suppress in progress in that court or another court.  A
continuance under this paragraph shall be limited to a maximum of 10
additional court days.
   (3) Only one continuance per case may be granted to the people
under this subdivision for cases involving stalking or those handled
under the Career Criminal Prosecution Program.  Any continuance
granted  to the people in a case involving stalking or handled under
the Career Prosecution Program shall be for the shortest time
possible, not to exceed 10 court days.
   (h) Upon a showing that the attorney of record at the time of the
defendant's first appearance in the superior court on an indictment
or information is a Member of the Legislature of this state and that
the Legislature is in session or that a legislative interim committee
of which the attorney is a duly appointed member is meeting or is to
meet within the next seven days, the defendant shall be entitled to
a reasonable continuance not to exceed 30 days.
   (i) A continuance shall be granted only for that period of time
shown to be necessary by the evidence considered at the hearing on
the motion.  Whenever any continuance is granted, the court shall
state on the record the facts proved that justify the length of the
continuance, and those facts shall be entered in the minutes.
   (j) Whenever it shall appear that any court may be required,
because of the condition of its calendar, to dismiss an action
pursuant to Section 1382, the court must immediately notify the Chair
of the Judicial Council.
   (k) This section shall not apply when the preliminary examination
is set on a date less than 10 court days from the date of the
defendant's arraignment on the complaint, and the prosecution or the
defendant moves to continue the preliminary examination to a date not
more than 10 court days from the date of the defendant's arraignment
on the complaint.
  SEC. 4.  Section 3 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section
1050 of the Penal Code proposed by both this bill and SB 69.  It
shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become
effective on or before January 1, 2000, (2) each bill amends Section
1050 of the Penal Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after SB 69, in
which case Section 2 of this bill shall not become operative.
